THE ESTABLISHMENT WANT TO GET RID OF DONALD TRUMP
By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
September 15, 2015
NWO wants Bush to be the next US President. Is the fix in?
This 2016 pre-election season with 17 Republican candidates
(now 16 with the withdrawal of former Texas Governor Rick Perry) is
specifically designed to give the Republicans another loser: Jeb Bush.
“Oh,” you say, “that can’t happen. Donald Trump, Ben Carson,
Ted Cruz and Carly Fiorina are far ahead of Jeb Bush in the polls, and it looks
like we’ll get a conservative nominee this time. Jeb Bush has very little
support from voters.”
Delegate votes rather than popularity of a candidate
determine Presidential nominees. That system has been skewed by those who
control the Republican National Committee (RNC) which, in turn, controls state
and county Republican committees. This system has given us middle-of-the-road
loser candidates like John McCain and Mitt Romney. Don’t get me wrong... I
liked Mitt Romney, but though he was a fiscal conservative, he was a social
liberal. I have no doubt Mitt would have been a far better President than the
current White House occupant.
There is little doubt that conservatives have a very
difficult time getting a conservative candidate nominated. Ronald Reagan is the
last conservative Republican candidate nominated and that was 1980 and 1984 –
and he was an anomaly. It is equally true that the GOP cannot win a national
election without the support of conservative voters. What a nice conundrum!
If it’s impossible for Republicans to win a national
election without conservative votes, it makes sense for the RNC to give the GOP
a conservative Republican candidate. But politics isn’t about making sense.
It’s about power... in this case, corrupted power run amok.
If a person who is more committed to the people than to the
party is elected to the Presidency, that person can change the power structure
of the Republican Party. The existing power structure of the Republican Party
would rather see a Democrat elected than lose their power base. It’s as simple
The problem for the powers that be is that people now know
the system is totally corrupt and are demanding change. The problem for the
people demanding change is they don’t understand the system and so don’t know
what specific demands for change to make. The people see their freedoms lost –
it used to be one-by-one, but is now a system-by-system loss: the system of
justice which now decides which laws it will enforce, the system of
legislative, judicial and executive balance set forth by the Constitution, our
guaranteed rights to freedom of religion, the right to own guns, the right for
business owners to refuse service to anyone they choose, and on and on.
So what is the GOP’s plan to surreptitiously nominate Jeb
To understand the process, you must understand the structure
of the system. You must especially understand what is termed “proportional
allocation of delegates,” especially in early-voting states.
Citizens appointed or elected as county and then state
delegates are the ones who at the Republican Convention nominate the
presidential candidate. It would take a book chapter not an article to explain
the various rules and regulations in place in different states regarding
winner-take-all versus proportional allocation rules. Since I don’t have a book
or a chapter available, the following paragraphs will give you an overview. For
more in-depth explanations, go here,
We tend to think that delegate votes reflect voter choice in
primaries or state conventions. It’s a reasonable assumption but the RNC has
put into place rules and regulations that thwart that logical approach. It’s
the only way it can protect the liberal progressive power base currently
controlling the Republican Party.
After the 2012 nomination of Mitt Romney, the RNC changed
party rules designed to prevent a candidate of the people rather than of the
party (read “conservative”) from getting the nomination. These rules require
all state contests held from March 1st through March 14th, whether in
caucus/convention or primary states, to allocate delegate committed votes on a
proportional basis. As I understand it, that means if a candidate gets 20% of
the vote in a state’s Congressional district, he/she gets 20% of the delegates from
that district. If the candidate wins 5%, the state commits to the candidate 5%
of the district’s delegates, etc.
Only four states are permitted to hold their
caucuses/convention or primaries prior to March 1st of any national election
year: Iowa, New Hampshire, South Carolina and Nevada. The rules adopted by the
RNC make it all but impossible for any candidate to run up a sizeable delegate
lead in the early state contests because there are numerous candidates still
running. The states that are more conservative – the Southern states (including
Texas, Virginia and North Carolina) have scheduled their contests during this
time. Colorado, Iowa and Minnesota are also good voting grounds for
conservatives and may hold their nominee contests by the March 15th deadline.
So what’s wrong with deciding which candidate the selected
delegates will support on a proportional basis? What’s wrong with giving all
candidates the percentage of delegates based on voter or convention results...
the percentage of votes they received?
A popular candidate – like the four leading conservative
candidates, Trump, Carson, Cruz and Fiorina -- could gain major delegate leads
in these early, mostly conservative state primaries and conventions if it
wasn’t for proportional allocation of delegates. Does the RNC believe the
concept of proportional allocation of votes reflects the will of the people? If
they did, Al Gore would have become President of the United States in 2000.
Instead, we have 16 candidates, each carefully selected for
one of several reasons, so populist candidates will get far fewer delegates
under proportional allocation because candidates that don’t stand a chance get
one or two or three delegates. In other words, conservative candidates cannot
build a lead during the time frame most conservative states hold their
conventions and/or primaries.
If that doesn’t explain to you how important it is for you
to get involved in local politics, nothing will. It is the only way we can take
back control of our state and county Republican parties. If conservatives
didn’t so dislike group power-based activities we could make a huge difference
in the way things are forced upon conservatives. If you have time for church
activities, for local service clubs, for bowling nights, you have time to
devote to freedom which makes all of them possible.
In 2012, Mitt Romney won the Ohio nominating contest by only
one point, but got 13 more delegates than Rick Santorum who came in second.
Wisconsin is a winner-take-all state which Romney won by eight points and got
all 24 delegates. Santorum won the North Dakota caucus but Romney was awarded
20 of the state’s 28 delegates to Santorum’s 6. How did this happen?
Proportional allocation of delegates versus winner-take-all and the timing of
each... the requirement that forces those states that hold their
caucus/conventions or primaries during the March 1st through March 14th dates
to allocate delegates on a proportional basis.
It is quite clear that the RNC has taken the nominating
process from the hands of the people and placed it in the hands of... the
Republican National Committee. It’s a bit like re-districting was handled when
Congressman Allen West ran for re-election in Florida. The State of Florida
carved out a district in which it was impossible for any conservative to win.
Why? Col. West is a conservative and the Republicans wanted to get rid of him.
That’s how these rats are micro-managing and manipulating
the nominating process so we cannot get conservative candidates elected.
However, there are even more maddening ploys being put in
play to ensure Jeb Bush will be the Republican nominee for President.
It’s actually quite a dark plot – worthy of those who
understand how to manipulate the political system to thwart the desires of the
people. Understanding that a plan is in place answers a lot of questions. For
example: “George Pataki? Why in the world would he enter the Republican race
for the Presidency? Does anyone but New Yorkers know who he is?” For an answer,
look at the number of delegate votes in high-population states. Or, “John
Kasich? They know who he is in Ohio... but in Montana or Idaho?” Ohio is a high-population,
high-delegate state. Former Virginia Governor, Jim Gilmore? Rick Santorum? High
delegate states. Ted Cruz? High delegate state (though I don’t think Cruz would
play ball in this kind of game).
First, why do we have 16 candidates in this ridiculous
parade of mostly politicians who know – and knew from the day they entered the
Presidential race – they have no chance of winning? Was it ego? Money?
Patriotism? Or are they part of a plan to siphon delegates to Jeb Bush?
This is more than a conspiracy theory. It is a plot that
makes all the sense in the world when you look at it through the dirty window
On March 1st – Super Tuesday – 601 delegates will be
proportionally determined in Texas, Alabama, Tennessee, Vermont, Arkansas,
Georgia, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Oklahoma, and Virginia. Look at how
many of these states tend to vote conservative and remember how proportional
assignment of delegates harms conservatives.
On Tuesday, March 8th, 130 delegates will be proportionally
determined in Michigan, Idaho, and Mississippi.
On Sunday, March 13th, Puerto Rico (with 23 delegates) holds
its delegate-assigning contest.
On Tuesday, March 15th, 234 delegates will be proportionally
determined in Florida, Ohio, and Illinois.
A total of 974 delegates will be assigned to one candidate
or another under the proportion allocation system. It only takes a couple of
hundred more votes to gain the nomination!
In Ohio, John Kasich will get a lot of votes because he’s
the Governor of that state and a favorite son. Does Kasich have a chance to win
the nomination? He’s pretty far down in the polls so to say “it’s possible” is
a bit of a stretch. Proportionally, he’s popular and will get a lot of
In Florida, Marco Rubio is a popular Senator and will draw
many votes. In Virginia, people know who Jim Gilmore is and some will vote for
him. Mike Huckabee will draw votes because he's the ex-Governor of Arkansas –
and he will draw votes from other Southern states because he’s a southerner.
And he’ll pull votes from the Christian voter block in all states. He is a
former pastor. Rick Santorum is well-known in Pennsylvania and will get
Christian votes – especially Catholic votes – in all Bible Belt states...
Oklahoma, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama, etc. Rand Paul is popular in Kentucky
and will get Libertarian votes in most states.
Do you see how carefully these candidates were selected for
their ability to draw votes away from very popular conservative candidates?
Will any of these people actually win these contests? Donald
Trump is (currently) so popular, it’s not likely (Kasich might in Ohio, Cruz
might in Texas, Rubio might in Florida... all big delegate states).
What happens after the primaries and conventions... after delegates have been
determined and promised to support this candidate or that? What happens is that
we move on to the Republican National Convention where the candidate for the
Office of the President of the United States is decided.
What happens when the Convention Secretary reads each state
by name and each state responds by giving a list of candidates to whom
proportional votes have committed delegates FOR THE FIRST ROUND OF VOTING?
Unless I’m mistaken, if no candidate is gets the required
votes to gain the nomination as President of the United States on the first
ballot, delegates may be released to vote for candidates of their choice. Or,
the 16 candidates who never won a primary – maybe never even got more than 20%
of the vote – can give their delegate votes to another candidate. And that’s
why we had 17 presidential candidates from high population states with large
numbers of delegates who have strong appeal to certain conservative splinter
groups. Of those candidates, about half were plants, the rest were legitimate
candidates. That’s why we had so many candidates who appeal to conservative
splinter groups – anti-abortion, anti-gay marriage, anti-Obamacare,
anti-Planned Parenthood, etc.
Do not be surprised if the candidate to whom they give their
votes is named Jeb Bush. When that
happens, it will tell you much about the character of the person who assigns
his or her votes to Governor Bush. It
will also tell you why they entered the race because this was their purpose
from day one.
There is much more that could be said about the political
mess we’ve allowed the National Republican Committee to make of the once proud
and conservative-based party, but as I said, I only have one article, not a
chapter or a book.
As we listen to the debates and as we near the
caucus/convention and primary seasons, it is critically important that you vote
and work for the best possible candidate, not a favorite son candidate or a
favorite issue candidate. Find the best candidate with the best chance to win
and vote for him or her.
© 2015 Marilyn M. Barnewall - All Rights Reserved