By Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
March 17, 2015
One of the things white Americans are going to have to come
to grips with is that that within 15 years (probably less) our race will be a
minority in this country.
I am of an age that I well remember
being told in the 1950s that the world was headed for over-population. It
would, we were told, result in mass starvation and responsible American
families should have no more than two children. The birth rate in white America
subsided almost immediately.
Communism, socialism, tribalism, and
oligarchies all have one thing in common: Someone else is responsible for your
life. From paying for your education, determining what kind of information will
be contained in that education/indoctrination, to your career choices, the fuel
your car will use (or whether you will be allowed to have a car or be forced to
live in cities of six million in population where people are stacked and packed
on top of one another that are scattered around the country), who/if you marry,
how/if children can be had, at what age medical care will be withdrawn… all
(according to Agenda 21) are decisions about you to be made by others.
A large percentage of people who
live in nations of the world that subscribe to one of these political
philosophies like the idea of having someone else determine what they can and
cannot do. They like being relieved of the responsibilities that go with
decision making. Every decision we make in life involves risk and a lot of
people are uncomfortable with risk management. If they are not the ones making
decisions, they feel they won’t be blamed for failure that results from them.
For those of us who think the
ultimate glory of life is controlling our own destiny, this is not just a
strange human reaction to government power, it is downright insane. It reeks of
malignant, evil energy. For Christians, the “it takes a village” mentality totally
violates the message of individual responsibility imparted by Jesus Christ,
turning His words into group thought with no personal responsibility for
individual behavior, no judgments between good and evil because God tells us He
will render judgment. If that interpretation of Biblical text was accurate, He
would a) not have given us a brain so we can judge what is good and what is
evil; b) He would not have provided the Ten Commandments without specific
definitions as to what each means (He leaves that to our judgment); and c) we
would confess our sins as a group, not individually.
As I look back on those messages of
reduced births from the 1950s (my teenage years) and evaluate the misbegotten
illegal immigration policies implemented by various government administrations
and departments, a pattern emerges.
When one views illegal immigration
from a totally neutral position, it is easy to see from actions taken that
government has preferences about which illegals they will welcome by ignoring
their presence, and which ones they will pursue for being in America illegally.
You can say “that’s not true” all you want but the statistics defeat your
words. The President’s own words prove my point and his Attorney General’s
actions – or lack of them – prove it, too.
Those who cross the Rio Grande River
with impunity and receive great rewards for their law breaking have similar
traits: 1) They come from tribal cultures where a chieftain of one kind or
another has controlled their lives with the same authority royalty once had in
old Europe. 2) They are “breeders.” They have far more children than they can
afford to feed or educate and depend on the generosity of others to take care
of their parental responsibilities which they abrogate (if they recognize such
responsibilities exist at all). 3) They are not white. 4) The people who are
white and would like to immigrate to America are denied the opportunity and if
they enter America illegally they are pursued by law enforcement which ignores
illegals from categories 1), 2), and 3).
I do not refer here simply to the
financially poor Mexicans who illegally cross our border, but to the Central
Americans who do the same. I refer also to Middle Easterners of whom almost all
are Muslims (who also have many children). What we saw in Paris during the
second week of January 2015 is reflective of the problems being caused
everywhere by Muslims who can’t stand the countries in which they live and run
away to London or Paris – or Detroit – where they make demands that their
adopted government change their country so it is more like the old country they
were forced to leave because of despicable living conditions. The message is:
“I want all of the advantages that a free enterprise economy produces relative
to advancement of civilization without any of the responsibilities that people
who live in a free enterprise economy must bear if those advantages are going
to be maintained.” Sharia law provides an escape route from decision making
because it makes decisions for you in every area of your life.
It can thus be said that those who
breed, those to whom being a member of a tribal community comes naturally, and
those who are not white are welcomed to our shores. Others are rejected by our
immigration policies. I dare anyone reading this who thinks my words are racist
or are otherwise slanted to provide meaningful evidence that there is one
factual error in my comment. There is not. It is an accurate evaluation of
immigration policy in America today.
I mentioned above that tribal
cultures are run by authority figures with the same power royalty once had
throughout the world. Why do you suppose the influence of royal rule was so
dramatically diminished over 200 years ago? Gee, you don’t suppose the
establishment of a free nation called the United States of America had anything
to do with it, do you? You don’t suppose that the tremendous growth of this new
nation – its economic success and stability, offering opportunity for all to
prosper without a class system that had outlived its usefulness – had anything
to do with it? Of course it did!
Here is my theory which is based on
thinking long and hard about the logical outcome of our current immigration
policy. It is simple logic.
The white race is the only one that
has throughout history resisted long-term slavery of any kind, including
tribalism, communism, and socialism. As far back as 1100, citizens of England
demanded and got the Charter of Liberties signed by their king because of royal
abuses of power over the people of that nation. When that didn’t work, they got
the Magna Carta signed. When that did not provide sufficient protection from
the royal abuse of power, in 1628 they demanded King Charles sign the Petition
of Rights. In 1641 came the Grand Remonstrance and Charles was gone. In 1688
King James was forced to sign the Glorious Resolution which was the English
Bill of Rights… it became official in 1689. All of these “Agreements” were
demanded by the people because royalty becomes tyrannical and abusive. And then
because of the royal abuse of power in 1776 we had the document so meaningful
to Americans: The Declaration of Independence.
The white race is the only one that
has throughout world history resisted long-term slavery – has been a proponent
of the “give me liberty or give me death” philosophy since we began recording
Since America’s immigration policies
favor admitting only illegal immigrants who consider tribalism not only an
accepted but a preferred way of life, it gives rise to a question. Is the
reason behind America’s immigration policy – amnesty for illegals – required so
tribal types can take from whites their majority status in historically white
nations? Does government need to replace whites as the dominant race in these
nations so the final plans for a New World Order can be implemented with
minimum objection or opposition by whites who resist tribalism, communism and
socialism as a form of slavery? One world government cannot be established
without America if our standard of living is too high. That standard must be
brought down to the level of other nations. Otherwise, other nations will not
accept world government because of the perceived preferential treatment of
those with a higher standard of living than is available to people of less
advanced countries of the world. Why are they less advanced? Because they
subscribe to tribalism, socialism, or communism.
The Mexicans and Central Americans
who enter our country illegally with the hidden invitation and blessings of
government are the poor of those nations. People born in poverty in Mexico and
Central America generally descend from Indian bloodlines. Indians, in general,
proudly prefer the tribal culture to that of individualism. There’s nothing
wrong with that. Whites prefer individualistic social orders – and individualism
opposes communism and socialism and oligarchies… forms of government required
if there is to be a world government – a New World Order. Tribal cultures not
only accept but approve of communism, socialism and oligarchies which are
compatible with tribal philosophies. The forms of government from which they
all flee throughout the world provide the hard evidence of the truth of my
The same is true of Muslims… their
history is one of tribal cultures. It is one of the reasons that no matter how
hard America tries to nation build in its own image in the Middle East, there
will be no individualist free enterprise system of government established with
these tribal people. They are tribal to their Muslim souls. All tribal people
are. It is not something that can be changed… nor can the individualistic
nature of those who seek the opportunity to manage the risks of controlling
their own destinies be changed.
If there is fault to be assigned
here, it is the arrogant fault of nations who believe they can force an
individualist-based system of government on people whose natural inclinations
These needs inside of people to be
either an individualist or a tribalist don’t go just an inch or two deep. They
run very deep and are not subject to change. They encompass a total social
order – which is why Muslims have Sharia law (and want it wherever they
re-settle when they leave their homeland behind to seek more opportunity –
which, under Sharia, is impossible to achieve).
If we look at the two different
cultures, tribalism and individualism, we see that each comes naturally to
certain groups of people. Both cultures have positives; both have negatives.
Each is needed by the other to achieve at maximum levels of productivity, but
because neither understands the other and because each fears the other, our
modern culture discourages either group from doing what it was put on earth to
do. Each tries to force itself on the other and war always follows such
attempts. Instead, both groups need to use their positive strengths to work
Individualists are mostly
entrepreneurs who consider control of their own destiny the ultimate objective.
They are the inventors and business owners of society. In America, they provide
employment for 70 percent of the total population. The fact that not all whites
are individualists is obvious by merely looking at the tribal mentalities of
Progressive Liberals. The fact that not all Muslims or Mexicans or Central
Americans are by nature tribal can be seen in independent business ownership.
Each group has a purpose.
Entrepreneurial individualists invent things… Steven Jobs who started Apple is
a good example of that. His business partner at the beginning, Bill Gates, is a
good example of the tribal (or corporate) mentality. I have always believed it
was this basic difference between the two that caused the break between them.
After the break, Steven Jobs and Apple came close to failure. Gates was brought
back into the Apple picture to help solve the problems caused by Jobs’
inability to deal with the large corporate environment that resulted from his
successful entrepreneurialism at Apple. The job of creating belongs to the
individualist; the job of creating corporate structure – safety and security –
belongs to the security-motivated tribal person.
The rogue political elements
currently running things worldwide understand this and are taking advantage of
overly confident individualists, using their own successes and money to quietly
eliminate them. They do so by preying on the security drives of tribalists,
giving them as many something for nothing deals money can buy… money wrung out
of individualist wallets. They think they’re pretty smart – but haven’t yet
come to grips with the fact that innovation does not come from either the
elitist or tribalist segments. It comes only from the imaginations of
individualists. As I said, both groups are a necessary commodity to a
successful social order. If they succeed in eliminating the individualist
segment, they will succeed at eliminating innovation and progress.
To come to a reasonable conclusion
as to whether a society is tribal or individually dominated, look at the
decision-making authority of government in opposition to the people, and look
at the court system that supports or doesn’t support it. When one looks at
these two things in America today, it can be said that we have become (or are
darned close to) a tribal/socialist society. But one must look closely enough
to see if tribalism exists because it is what the people want or because the
people have the socialist boot of tyranny firmly planted on their necks.
Tribalism will exist in America when
freedom-loving whites are no longer the majority population and will be quickly
morphed into socialism and then communism (even though the communist system has
failed everywhere it has been tried).
Due to the bloody violence used by
Muslims who have absolutely no respect for “civilized wars” (if there is such a
thing), there is an attitude of disrespect towards Islam and the Muslims who
subscribe to it. Who can respect any people whose social barbarism permits the
live burial of Christian children? The beheading of innocents? To those Muslims
who say Islam is a religion of peace, all I can say is I believe what I see,
not what you say. I say the same thing to those who call themselves Christians
but who approve of abortion.
The attitude is quite similar to the
disrespect and hatred shown towards Jews by the National Socialist (NAZI) Party
in Germany prior to World War II. I do not suggest there is a correlative in
place that justifies the comparison. The Jews so hated by the Nazis were not
beheading people or raping young girls or burying young boys in sand while they
were still alive as Muslims do. They didn’t burn a pilot shot down in war while
holding him in a cage. The Jews were not barbaric. They were (and are),
however, the bankers of the world – the name Rothschild is not the best liked
around the world.
I suggest to white people that we
understand what is being done to us. The populations of the world are being
restructured so those with tribal histories can replace whites in nations
throughout the world. It is being done purposefully with the end objective
being a New World Order that embodies one world government.
I suggest to you that is the only
logical reason for the immigration policies of Europe (as well as other
Continents) and for the illegal alien policies of the United States. We are
being replaced to get rid of the “give me liberty or give me death” mentality
that goes hand-in-hand with being white (which makes a majority of us
individualists) so an oligarchic system of socialism (which always, according
to Karl Marx, leads to communism) can be implemented.
© 2015 Marilyn M. Barnewall - All